2

I am reading about a new bill to lower the minimum wage in Puerto Rico from \$7.25 to \$4.25 per hour. This comes at a time, when both the New York and California have chosen to raise their minimum wages from \$9/hr to \$15/hr.

Are there any theories of how this affects work in a population?

Have any economists chimed in on the topic of minimum wage in general in general? Can any of it be used to predict what will happen to PR?


Why might policy makers feel a decrease is warranted in one situation while an increase is warranted in another?

john mangual
  • 121
  • 3
  • 1
  • Please use the search function before posting. I've selected one question that already answers this, but the search function will immediately show you (at least) 5 questions related to the theoretical and actual impact of minimum wages: http://economics.stackexchange.com/search?q=minimum+wages – FooBar Apr 18 '16 at 16:44
  • 1
    @FooBar I am asking about decreasing the minimum wage – john mangual Apr 18 '16 at 16:53
  • That doesn't matter. There's no reason to assume the relationship is not symmetric. – FooBar Apr 18 '16 at 19:36
  • 1
    @FooBar You are right the theory of minimum wage is quite clear, but there definitely is asymmetry here. I don't know why policy moved in one direction for NY and CA and in another direction for PR. All of these are within the United States. – john mangual Apr 18 '16 at 19:55
  • Sure, if you ask "Why did PR policy makers decrease the minimum wage" you'll have a different (and unique) question. – FooBar Apr 18 '16 at 20:27
  • @FooBar As the OP to the question you linked, I can testify that this is not a duplicate of that question. My question asked for reasons why people (esp. politicians) would want to increase the minimum wage; this question asks how the decrease in minimum wage will affect the workforce. Now, it could be a duplicate of another question, but it is definitely not a duplicate of mine. – Mathematician Apr 18 '16 at 22:20
  • @Mathematician Verbatim from the current version of this question: "Why might policy makers feel a decrease is warranted in one situation while an increase is warranted in another?". – FooBar Apr 19 '16 at 07:36

1 Answers1

1

Typically, what happens when a minimum wage is relaxed is that a plethora of jobs that were illegal under the previous doctrine become available on the market for workers.

The common metaphor used by its supporters for describing the minimum wage is that a minimum wage is a "price floor" under which wages are not permitted to fall, ostensibly to protect workers.

The accurate metaphor for describing the minimum wage is a price hurdle which each person's productivity must clear in order to sell your product (i.e. your labor) If your productivity is not valued by a buyer at a higher rate than the strictures placed upon it by legislation, it is illegal for you to have that job.

All other things held equal, reducing the minimum wage will create options for suppliers of cheap labor to actually have their product clear the market rather than having it denied by the State.