19

A DFA has a synchronizing word if there is a string that sends any state of the DFA to a single state. In ‘The Cerny Conjecture for Aperiodic Automata” by A. N. Trahtman (Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science vol. 9:2, 2007, pp.3-10), he wrote,

Cerny conjectured in 1964 that every n-state synchronizable DFA possesses a synchronizing word of length at most $(n-1)^2$.

He also wrote, "in the case when the underlying graph of the aperiodic DFA is strongly connected, this upper bound has been recently improved by Volkov who has reduced the estimation to $n(n + 1)/6$.

  1. Does anybody know the current status of Cerny conjecture?

  2. And in which paper Volkov obtained the result n(n+1)/6 ?

Thanks for any pointer or link.

Hermann Gruber
  • 6,470
  • 1
  • 35
  • 58
Nobody
  • 295
  • 4
  • 13
  • After I posted the question, I did a search and found the answer of my second question, in which paper Volkov obtained the result n(n+1)/6?

    The answer is ‘Synchronizing Automata Preserving a Chain of Partial Orders’ Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2007, Volume 4783/2007, 27-37, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76336-9_5

     – Nobody Nov 25 '10 at 13:13
  • 8
    you can edit the question to reflect this. – Suresh Venkat Nov 25 '10 at 17:40

2 Answers2

19

Trakhtman has a bibliography on the problem, which is apparently kept up to date; so I suppose Černý's question remains unresolved until today. The same is stated in Volkov's recent survey (LATA 2008) linked from the wikipedia article cited in the question. There you find pointers to some partial results, for example, for which subclasses of regular languages the conjecture is known to be true. Even more recent is a research paper by Ananichev, Gusev & Volkov (MFCS 2010) on a related topic, where they confirm that Černý's conjecture is still open now (at least as of May 2010).

Hermann Gruber
  • 6,470
  • 1
  • 35
  • 58
  • 2
    In 2012, Trahtman uploaded a paper to arXiv, where he presents an effort to solve the conjecture. This was more than a year ago. Is there any news on the correctness of the proof? – molnarg Sep 28 '13 at 20:47
  • 2
    In the comment section on the current version (v7) of the arXiv preprint, the author states "13 pages, examples, wrong version. The proof of the Černý conjecture is wrong": http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4626 – Hermann Gruber Jul 20 '14 at 11:32
3

see ArXiv: 1405.2435 cs.FL "The length of a minimal synchronizing word and the \v{C}erny conjecture" with the story of study https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.2435.pdf

trahtman
  • 31
  • 1