While this doesn't answer your exact question, CFG parsing is a decision problem that was reduced from matrix multiplication (so it is as hard as matrix multiplication in a sense).
Specifically, in [1] it was shown that CFG parsing is as hard as boolean matrix multiplication. In particular, if CFG parsing (a decision problem) can be solved in $O(gn^{3-\epsilon})$ time, boolean matrix multiplication can be solved in $O(n^{3-\epsilon/3})$ time. An interesting aspect is that matrix multiplication can also be used for fast CFG algorithms, so the problems are computationally equivalent in a sense.
The reduction has some unusual aspects because boolean matrix multiplication requires $n^2$ output bits, whereas CFG parsing only requires one. To deal with this, the paper assumes that the CFG parser solves certain subproblems when parsing the string (and argues that this is a reasonable assumption to make). The reduction makes $n^2$ queries to these subproblems to obtain the product matrix.
Thus CFG parsing is a decision problem that is computationally as hard (in a sense) as matrix multiplication. However, this is not specifically a decision version of matrix multiplication, and furthermore, the reduction relies on the idea that CFG parsing is actually made up of $n^2$ decision subproblems.
- Lee, Lillian. "Learning of context-free languages: A survey of the literature." Techn. Rep. TR-12-96, Harvard University (1996).