1

As the title says, what is "the universe", according to Christianity?

The term does not occur in the Bible, making it impossible to address this question through hermeneutics alone. However, many arguments about creation assert that God created it, whatever "it" is. See here for an example. What is it, and what is in it, according to Christianity? If there are different concrete interpretations of what the universe is, what are those arguments or definitions?

I am asking for an overview of viewpoints on this subject.

curiousdannii
  • 20,140
  • 14
  • 58
  • 126
pygosceles
  • 2,009
  • 6
  • 15
  • 1
    The term does not occur in the Bible, making it impossible to address this question – Nigel J Jan 12 '24 at 19:21
  • @NigelJ That cannot possibly be true, since "Christianity" allegedly relies on all sorts of terms that occur nowhere in the Bible, including existence, the universe, ex nihilo, and numerous other invented or parallel terms, all resorted to in an attempt to explain away the most basic claims of supposed Christianity, without Biblical grounding. If what you are saying were true then none of these terms could even be germane to attempting to explain Christianity to anyone. This is not the hermeneutics forum. – pygosceles Jan 12 '24 at 19:37
  • 1
    Just a few days ago, news came of cosmologists having discovered a ring of stars of gargantuan size, a few million light-years away, which makes them think they will have to revise all their theories about the universe. As a Christian, that makes me think the universe is beyond our ken, and that the need is to focus on the Creator of all matter. Not an answer to this Q, of course; just a comment. – Anne Jan 13 '24 at 11:16
  • @Anne That's awesome. Similar things are happening on this Earth; I saw this report a few years back about how archaeology textbooks will need to be rewritten because we just hadn't seen before what is already there. https://www.brown.edu/news/2018-09-26/lidar – pygosceles Jan 13 '24 at 15:23

2 Answers2

1

What is the universe, according to Christianity?

There is no reason to suppose that any Christian denomination would not accept the classic definition of what the universe is at a scientific level: ”the totality of existence".

The physical universe is defined as all of space and time (collectively referred to as spacetime) and their contents. Such contents comprise all of energy in its hvarious forms, including electromagnetic radiation and matter, and therefore planets, moons, stars, galaxies, and the contents of intergalactic space. The universe also includes the physical laws that influence energy and matter, such as conservation laws, classical mechanics, and relativity.

The universe is often defined as "the totality of existence", or everything that exists, everything that has existed, and everything that will exist. In fact, some philosophers and scientists support the inclusion of ideas and abstract concepts—such as mathematics and logic—in the definition of the universe. The word universe may also refer to concepts such as the cosmos, the world, and nature. - Universe

Most Christians would be at ease with the above definition as to what the Universe actually is. How it came into matter may be a different subject matter altogether. What is sure is that at one point of time God created the universe and all that it contains.

The classic Christian doctrine of creation is expressed as creation ex nihilo (out of nothing) is widely accepted. The writer who most thoroughly developed this concept was Augustine. He said God spoke the universe into being out of nothing. God did not take eternally preexisting matter or substance and reshape or reconfigure it into the present world. His creative activity is not like that of human designer or worker.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. - Genesis 1:1

The Bible really does not give us a definition of the universe, but Galileo Galilei makes a simple yet profound statement about the universe:

The Bible shows the way to go to heaven, not the way the heavens go. - Galileo and the Interpretation of the Bible

What Happened Before God Created the World?

How He created the heavens and the earth may remain a mystery even after we are in heaven. What He was doing before He created everything is another completely unanswerable question.

There was no time before creation.

Saint Augustine had two answers to those who asked what was God doing before creation. Jokingly he said, God was preparing Hell for people who ask such questions. On a serious level, he noted there was no time before God created and hence the question is meaningless. When God created the heavens and the earth He also created space and time. Before time began there was only eternity. God is a timeless being and time only began with His creation of the universe.

Ken Graham
  • 71,079
  • 6
  • 53
  • 173
  • I think your definition should be "the totality of material existence". That's equivalent to the definition used by Materialists (who reject the immaterial, and so for whom the Spiritual could not possibly be part of the "universe"), and that seems consistent with your Answer. I also think that's how most Christians would understand the term. – Matthew Jan 15 '24 at 20:44
-1

The word "universe" derives from a combination of Latin uni- meaning "one" or "united", with versus, which has the meaning "turned", cognate with modern "verse", as in a line of writing, a verse of Scripture or a song. It can also denote a furrow or the "turn of a plow".

Word origin of "universe" per Oxford Languages

The native meaning of the word "universe" is therefore "all that is". It is the sum total of everything written, everything planted, the field and furrow in which every object, being and act are sown and grown, and the consequence of every word spoken by God, now and in the future.

God is, and He is therefore part of the universe, therefore it must be understood when we say that He created the universe, that He did not create Himself. There does not exist a sensible definition of the term when intended to mean "all that is", if "all that is" were exclusive of God, because God IS (Exodus 3:14). Therefore there is also more to the universe than mortal man understands, and more to creation also, and Being precedes Creation.

Given that the universe is unimaginably vast, we need not preoccupy ourselves with the question of whether there can be more than one universe since, in a plural sense, multiple "universes" (multiple single lines of text or multiple furrows of the plow) would consist of all that there is, just as when the alternate meaning of "uni" is pursued (the union of), it also means "all that there is" encompassed within a single instance. With an infinite space and infinite expanse of eternity on either side, it is obviously true that there are more lines of text than one in many books and there are many books in the world and there are many worlds, and the whole universe contains them all. This suggests that as there are more galaxies and worlds than the eye can behold, there are also more words, more furrows, more lines, more fields, more worlds, and more verses to the song of Creation than mankind has ever conceived of.

It is never-ending.

enter image description here

pygosceles
  • 2,009
  • 6
  • 15
  • 2
    "God is, and He is therefore part of the universe, therefore it must be understood when we say that He created the universe, that He did not create Himself" This is an unnecessarily complicate way to avoid pantheism caused by a slightly imprecise definition of universe. – eques Jan 12 '24 at 16:22
  • 2
    Using universe to refer to all that is reminds me of the etymology of atom, something which cannot be divided. Universe & atom are interesting artifacts of language coined before people knew there were things smaller than atoms, or started speculating about multiverses. But, to your point, universe is not a Biblical term. There's a related post on Hermeneutics Stack Exchange on the Biblical term "heavens". – Hold To The Rod Jan 12 '24 at 17:29
  • 2
    This is an overview (3 denominations is a minimum) question and as such must have supported proofs and links that this post is fulfilling that obligation. – Ken Graham Jan 12 '24 at 23:29
  • Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on [meta], or in [chat]. Comments continuing discussion may be removed. – Ken Graham Jan 15 '24 at 21:32