4

I am curious to hear what the term “Son of God” means to a Biblical Unitarian when it applies to Jesus.

Luke Hill
  • 5,023
  • 3
  • 15
  • 67

2 Answers2

2

1. 'Son of God' has its primary meaning in Jesus' conception by the power of God (Luke 1:35). As the angel Gabriel explains

"The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the Holy One to be born will be called the Son of God."

This is confirmed by a voice from heaven at Matthew 3:17.

"This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased!""

2. However, 'the Son of God' is also a prophetic title, and is a co-referent with 'Messiah' and 'King of Israel'. All 3 are linked in Psalm 2.

"His Anointed One [...] I have installed My King on Zion [...] You are My Son; today I have become Your Father."

You see this reflected by Caiaphas at Matthew 26:63.

"Then the high priest said to Him, "I charge You under oath by the living God: Tell us if You are the Christ, the Son of God.""

Caiaphas here is using the two titles, "the Christ" and "the Son of God" as roughly synonymous or co-referential. The second clarifies the meaning of the first, and presumably refers to Psalm 2 (among other places) for its meaning.

So in this sense, 'Son of God' is that person who fulfills the prophecies of Psalm 2 in particular.

You also see this linking of roles in Psalm 2 with Nathanael at John 1:49.

""Rabbi," Nathanael answered, “You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!""

Again, the terms here are used seemingly as co-referents and roughly speaking as synonymous phrases. (Note the term 'rabbi' wasn't seen by Nathanael as incompatible with 'the Son of God'. Rabbis are human beings, and Son of God for Nathanael did not mean God the Son.)

3. Combining 1. and 2., the term 'the Son of God' also suggests the task He heroically fulfills (despite real risk He might fail), leading to the triumph of his death, resurrection, and then ascension, where He now rules at the right hand of God.

Only True God
  • 6,628
  • 1
  • 18
  • 55
  • Does this mean Jesus did not pre-exist before Mary conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit? – Lesley May 01 '22 at 07:09
  • 1
    @Lesley The standard BU understanding of Jesus' pre-existence is notional, i.e., in the mind of God. Notional pre-existence is a well-established trope in ancient Jewish literature. – Only True God May 01 '22 at 07:10
  • Thanks for the explanation, although I confess "notional pre-existence" is not a concept I've ever heard off. Is there any biblical support for that? – Lesley May 01 '22 at 07:57
  • 1
    Jesus is not part of John 1:1-3 Why, pray tell do people read whatever they want into the word of God? Jesus, obviously, by John's own inspired words, place Jesus only 2000 yrs ago. when the logos became flesh through Mary. – steveowen May 01 '22 at 11:18
  • New question: https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/90895/according-to-biblical-unitarians-how-much-does-notionalism-encompass-in-john – Mike Borden May 01 '22 at 11:48
  • @steveowen It is too late for me to edit my comment so I deleted and replaced Jesus with Christ for you. – Mike Borden May 01 '22 at 11:50
  • If Christ's pre-existence was only notional (John 1:1) would this mean that his involvement in the creation of all things (john 1:3) was only notional as well? Was only "notional" life in him (John 1:4)? – Mike Borden May 01 '22 at 11:51
  • I will probably end up giving you the bounty - but I will wait just in case someone gives a better answer. – Luke Hill May 01 '22 at 14:27
  • @Lesley Very important concept from the BU pov. This article is a start from the BU perspective https://21stcr.org/commentaries/preexistence-overview/preexistence-articles/literal-and-notional-pre-existence/ There are both clear Biblical and extra-Biblical examples of it in ancient Jewish literature. – Only True God May 01 '22 at 15:40
  • @MikeBorden BUs tend not to agree that the Christ = the Logos. John 1:14 is like saying "my idea for the cup became the cup." There is no big metaphysical issue. The plan for the cup informs and leads to and is reflected in the cup, but there is no identity in a straightforward sense being posited. – Only True God May 01 '22 at 15:42
  • Since BU's don't accept Jesus was God incarnate, that he came from heaven in order to become fully human, then did his life start with his conception in the womb of Mary? Prior to that he was just a concept in the mind of God the Father? I'm afraid I don't place much store in ancient Jewish literature. But thanks for your patience. – Lesley May 01 '22 at 16:51
  • @Lesley Yes. according to BUs usually, Jesus' life started with his conception in Mary. Prior to that He 'existed' in the sense of being part of God's plan. – Only True God May 01 '22 at 20:23
-3

What does the son of God mean regarding Jesus?

From a Biblical Unitarian understanding as requested, Jesus is the one God sent into the world. He is the only holy man, born of Mary by God's intervention (as the 2nd Adam) who has accomplished what God sent him to do. Without him, there could be no resurrection to eternal life, no remission of sin, no reconciliation with God and no defeat of evil and death, no new heavens or new earth. Jesus, as the holy son of God, accomplished all this as a man and not as God.

Generally the same as most Christian denominations, except for Jesus being a man only as expressed by the scriptures below.

Beginning with the 4 complementary Gospels, the origin and means of Jesus' beginning is explained.

the angel said to her, “Fear not, Mary; for you have found favour with God. 31And behold, you will conceive in womb, and will bring forth a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. 32He will be great, and he will be called Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, 33and he will reign over the house of Jacob to the ages. And of his kingdom there will be no end!”

35And the angel answering, said to her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore also the holy one being born will be called the Son of God Luke 1:30-35

Luke begins his Gospel with this important pronouncement. Luke 1:3-

it seemed fitting to me as well, having investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in an orderly sequence, most excellent Theophilus; 4so that you may know the exact truth about the things you have been taught.

An exact truth... To infer another beginning or to suggest there is another pre-existing Son is without biblical merit and support unless one relies on biased translations and solitary, mis-applied proof texts.

The Lord Jesus is who Peter said he was, “a man approved of God” Acts 2:22. I wont labour the matter here with all the scriptures describing Jesus as a man. Simply, that is all he is described as - a holy man without sin who experienced life as all men do - facing evil (temptation) and relying totally on his God and Father to save him from sin and a resultant death (Heb 5:7).

Jesus himself said he was a man. To make him something other is to make him a liar or to make him speak with forked tongue.

But now you seek to kill me, a man who has spoken to you the truth that I heard from God. John 8:40

That Jesus has a God - just as all men do, even once raised from the dead, exalted to God's right side, he still (obviously) has a God, Rev 3.

I ascend to my Father and your Father, and my God and your God John 20:17

So the son of God is not God, no scripture says he is, but supports the consistent revelation of the man born of Mary, who could be the Lamb of God - being tempted, able to sin, able to die - none of which God can do.

Now this is eternal life: that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent. John 17:3

We also have confirmed that Jesus began as a mortal human actually mastered by death just as all men are Rom 6:9. He has his own will which needed to be made subject to God's will - all his life to, and including the cross. After he was raised by his God and Father, he became the firstborn of the dead and the firstborn of creation (these are two descriptors of the same occasion).

He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation... he is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that he himself will come to have first place in everything Col 1:15-18

'First place' under God in all things. God who gave him life (John 5:26), the spirit and the giver of spirit life (Acts 2:33) to those who trust in him because God has granted him authority - while on earth to forgive sin and raise the dead, and in heaven to judge and grant eternal life at the resurrection. Of himself, he said he could do nothing (John 5:30) but did and spoke as God gave him.

Jesus, the Son of God, born of Mary, descendant of Abraham (Gal 3:16) and David, promised and prophesied since Gen 3 of the one to come who would be the Messiah and Saviour of the world, defeated evil and death, made Lord and Christ, and now sits at God's right hand in command over all things under God.

For Jesus to be also (somehow) God, this generates far too many contradictions with scripture to remain a valid hypothesis.

Conclusion

What does it mean for Biblical Unitarians that Jesus is the son of God?

It means that he is who he said he was and not what tradition says he should be. As the brief sampling above shows, Jesus is a man only and not a pre-existing ‘God the Son’ scripture makes no mention of.

Jesus is the one who 'overcame', who learned obedience through suffering, who submitted his different will to align with God's, who was tempted in all things as men are yet without sin. This God could do without any trouble, so why go through all this complicated process at all? God needs to overcome nothing, does not need to learn, or grow or mature. The concept of a two-natured Jesus is also without scriptural support and is unfortunately a doctrine of men and not of God or of the teachers God established the church under, the Apostles.

The BU understanding of Jesus aligns with scripture in ways that no other denomination does. There is no need to add to the word of God, it is self-interpretive and needs no post-Apostolic creeds to explain Jesus or God or the holy spirit.

Extracted in part from Jesus is the son of God, not God the Son.

steveowen
  • 1
  • 1
  • 7
  • 20
  • 3
    How is Jesus the son of God? this is not what I’m asking. I’m asking what it means for Christ to be the son of God. – Luke Hill Apr 26 '22 at 12:51
  • You also asked, what the term “Son of God” means. maybe you should align the two questions to be more specific. You did not ask about 'Christ'. – steveowen Apr 26 '22 at 13:06
  • 2
    means to a Biblical Unitarian when it applies to Jesus. is something I explicitly said. The title asks the same thing. – Luke Hill Apr 26 '22 at 13:13
  • 3
    This does not answer the question 'according to Biblical Unitarians'. I would expect reference to be made to documentation, not just a personal exposition of one's own view of scripture. – Nigel J Apr 26 '22 at 14:06
  • 1
    @NigelJ maybe you got a bit flustered and didn’t get to the end. There is a link to an article which is BU - a term specifically requested by OP. There are many other Unitarian groups which form part of the Unitarian Christian Alliance. They would be a agreeable. – steveowen Apr 30 '22 at 22:11
  • @steveowen you aren’t actually answering the question. You are just saying that the conclusion isn’t the traditional one. That’s not helpful. I want a definition, not an angry rant about how wrong the “traditional” view is. – Luke Hill May 01 '22 at 00:37
  • Your, ‘what does it mean’ can be understood many ways. This is my response to a rather ambiguous question. It’s not a rant, it’s the biblical response. – steveowen May 01 '22 at 03:15
  • Pretty good summary. Luke 1 is where it's at. The Son of God is so called because He was conceived by the power of God, as the angel explains to Mary. God confirms this at Matthew 3:17. Way too simple, right? Unlike Trinitarianism, which has kept many theologians busy for many hundreds of years, Unitarianism tends to be pretty simple to understand. Following on that are the secondary meanings involved in Jesus' sinless life, ascension, and his now ruling at the right hand of God. – Only True God May 01 '22 at 06:35