1

This excellent question What are the positions relative to each other in the Catholic church's clerical hierarchy? | @Reluctant_Linux_User and its answers have revived some questions on my part which I am hoping to get some understanding and clarity to.

In the wake of the Catholic Church's sex abuse scandal, a lawsuit was filed against the Holy See to my understanding, on the grounds that the Pope was the boss of the bishops who by their actions and omissions, allowed for the abusing priests to continue abusing.

Restricting the answer to the following: Pope, Bishops, Priests, how do these relate to one another in the Church's hierarchy? What is the reporting structure like and how does that differ from a Corporate company structure headed by a CEO?

Please note that in my answer, even though the priest ranks higher than the deacon, they both seems to be responsible to the Bishop.


Please note:

The other referenced question and its answers do not fully answer:

  1. Where in those answers does it address the comparisons with a Corporate company structure headed by a CEO?
  2. Where do those answers explain the priests and deacons both being responsible to the Bishop yet the deacon is of a lower rank?
  3. Where do those answers clarify that the Pope is NOT the "boss" of Bishops as understood by the secular world?
  4. The question what are is very different from how do.
  • The linked duplicate says "how do they relate to one another in the church's governing structure?". Your question here says: "how do these relate to one another in the Church's hierarchy?". That you are also asking an answer to compare and contrast this with a typical CEO business structure is irrelevant because that is off-topic anyway by itself. This is not a business site. There is the workplace. Perhaps you can learn more there about business structures. –  Dec 06 '14 at 21:28
  • In the future, it is better if you post why you think it is not a duplicate on the meta site, then you may link to the meta post. Putting meta content on the main site is not a good idea. It clutters things and makes it difficult to see what the question is on its own. So you should post on meta, roll this back to an edit without the meta stuff in it, then link to the meta post. –  Dec 06 '14 at 21:30
  • @fredsbend The relevance: people coming to learn about Christianity come from their perception one of which is the understanding from the secular world and shown in the link regarding the lawsuit. You are very much mistaken. –  Dec 06 '14 at 21:33
  • @FMS What I am saying is that if the question were not a duplicate (but it is) then it would be fine if you included it, but it would be an afterthought to any answer. To thoroughly compare these things you need a great answer on workplace structure too, which is off-topic here. What I am pointing out is that if you expect a lot of in depth analysis about workplaces here then you're going to be disappointed. –  Dec 06 '14 at 21:36
  • From the answer here it is clear those answers did not answer this question here and its particulars.
  • –  Dec 06 '14 at 21:36
  • 'Putting meta content on the main site is not a good idea.' No idea what this means.
  • –  Dec 06 '14 at 21:37
  • 'What I am pointing out is that if you expect a lot of in depth analysis about workplaces here then you're going to be disappointed.' - Please refrain from assuming the purpose I asked the question. –  Dec 06 '14 at 21:38
  • @FMS It is not appropriate to argue against a duplicate status in the question itself! And even if it were, it is ridiculous to make your last point be "Etc., etc."! – curiousdannii Dec 08 '14 at 10:19
  • @FMS Please note that Caleb agreed the argument against the duplicate status does not belong in the question itself. Thank you for cleaning it up. I won't remove it again, but I'd suggest you ask him on chat some time about when it is acceptable to do this or not. – curiousdannii Dec 09 '14 at 02:10