Questions tagged [pratityasamutpada]

Pratītyasamutpāda (Sanskrit:प्रतीत्यसमुत्पाद; Pali: पटिच्चसमुप्पाद paṭiccasamuppāda) is commonly translated as dependent origination or dependent arising. A central concept in the Buddhist tradition that all things arise in dependence upon multiple causes and conditions. The term is also used to refer to a specific application of this general principle — namely the twelve links of dependent origination.

Pratītyasamutpāda (Sanskrit:प्रतीत्यसमुत्पाद; Pali: पटिच्चसमुप्पाद paṭiccasamuppāda) is commonly translated as dependent origination or dependent arising. A central concept in the Buddhist tradition that all things arise in dependence upon multiple causes and conditions. The term is also used to refer to a specific application of this general principle — namely the twelve links of dependent origination.

The concept of pratītyasamutpāda (in both the general and specific meanings) is the basis for other key concepts in Buddhism, such as karma and rebirth, the arising of dukkha (suffering), and the possibility of liberation through realizing no-self (anatman). The general principle of pratītyasamutpāda (that everything is interdependent) is complementary to the concept of emptiness (sunyata).

Source: Wikipedia

136 questions
7
votes
6 answers

According to Dependent Origination ..dependent on feeling, craving arises, are there exceptions?

Are there exceptions that pleasant feeling is not followed by craving, and unpleasant feeling not followed by aversion? I understand cases where when one is mindful, feeling does not lead to craving. Feeling just arises and ceases. Another way of…
Samadhi
  • 3,398
  • 10
  • 22
7
votes
3 answers

bhava (kammabhava, upapattibhava) and jati

How is the connection between bhava (as kamma-bhava and upapatti-bhava) and jāti as links in the twelve link formula of dependant arising to be understood?
Simo
  • 121
  • 4
5
votes
2 answers

Can you actually focus on how birth leads to aging, death, suffering, stress as direct experience in dependent co-arising?

Can I focus on the link between birth and aging, death, suffering, in dependent co-arising in my own mind? Or do I have to know how birth leads to aging etc. intellectually. Does birth in dependent co-arising appear in the mind?
Buddhistdude
  • 619
  • 3
  • 6
5
votes
1 answer

How to prevent the development of insight to become ignorance anew?

It is necessary to develop insight in the way ignorance lies at the basis for the conditioning of suffering. See 12 links of dependent co-origination. Insight in the conditioning of suffering is developed by seeing the four noble truths at work at…
4
votes
4 answers

Is there a circular reasoning in origin of consciousness?

Dependent Origination says, given the consciousness, name and form arises. But in SN12.65 it says name-form is condition for consciousness: When consciousness exists there are name and form. Consciousness is a condition for name and form.’ ‘viññāṇe…
SacrificialEquation
  • 1,389
  • 1
  • 5
  • 11
3
votes
3 answers

Hard to understand becoming in paticca samupadda

It is said that dependent on becoming birth arises. How can I understand becoming? What is becoming? Can you give me a simile by which I can understand it? For example it is very easy to understand that dependent on birth, death arises because…
user4878
3
votes
6 answers

How exactly is consciousness created out of the formations, from ignorance, in the Twelve Links of Dependent Origination?

I am reading into and thinking about https://www.rigpawiki.org/index.php?title=Twelve_links_of_dependent_origination and the first 3 in particular, which basically is a derivation of consciousness from nothing! A few questions about this: The first…
Lance
  • 635
  • 3
  • 8
3
votes
2 answers

What is the meaning of “becoming, birth, old age & death” in the 12 links?

Finding resources to better understand the meaning of the 12 links of dependent origination has been challenging for me. The best resource I've been able to find to decipher the meaning thus far is this dharma talk. 2009-06-21: Gil Fronsdal:…
Alex Ryan
  • 594
  • 2
  • 12
3
votes
8 answers

Is dependent co-arising an "IF AND ONLY IF A THEN B" relation?

"IF AND ONLY IF A THEN B" means if you get B you get A, if you get A you get B, if you don't get B you don't get A, and if you don't get A you don't get B. Does dependent co-arising have the same relation I've mentioned above? "From ignorance as a…
Damith
  • 1,231
  • 6
  • 18
3
votes
2 answers

This consciousness turns back; it doesn't go further than name-and-form

In SN 12.65, we read about the cyclic relationship between consciousness and name-and-form, which has been asked in this question. However, this sutta also has the curious phrase in bold below. What does this phrase mean? "This consciousness turns…
ruben2020
  • 36,945
  • 5
  • 31
  • 94
3
votes
5 answers

What is the duality of body and external name-and-form?

What is the duality of body and external name-and-form? What is the difference between the two? What is the relationship between the two? From the Balapandita Sutta (SN 12.19) (translated by Bhikkhu Sujato): “Mendicants, for a fool hindered by…
ruben2020
  • 36,945
  • 5
  • 31
  • 94
3
votes
4 answers

Dhamma riddle? What does it mean?

I found a dhamma riddle below. What do we think it means?
Dhamma Dhatu
  • 41,600
  • 2
  • 31
  • 80
2
votes
5 answers

How could one know that Nibbana is the cessation of consciousness if there is no consciousness?

How could one know that Nibbana is the cessation of consciousness if there is no consciousness? I can't see how one could know.
Angus
  • 554
  • 2
  • 14
2
votes
4 answers

Difference between the Scientific Law of Causality and the Buddhist Law of Conditionality

What is the difference between the scientific law of causality and the Buddhist law of conditionality (Paṭiccasamuppāda)? I am not convinced with the way Ven. Bikkhu Bodhi, for example, has drawn the distinction between the two. According to him,…
Sushil Fotedar
  • 547
  • 3
  • 10
2
votes
3 answers

Why ancient Prasangika buddhist Chandrakirti claimed "There is no chariot which depends on its parts"?

Today during reference checking I arrived at this wiki page, where the famous ancient Prasangika buddhist Chandrakirti claimed "There is no chariot which depends on its parts"? But per the firmly established "dependent origination" Buddhism's key…
cinch
  • 135
  • 6
1
2 3