I'm a bit confused about when and how I am supposed to practice each of the four foundations? Do I do it all at the same time or do I break it down into different activities etc? Can someone please clarify?
5 Answers
In becoming a Bhikku with an idea of performing the practice of breathing towards samatha and vipassana (calm and insight) without first attempting kayagata-satipatthana (mindfulness as regards the body), resembles an owner who yokes the still untamed bullock (an adult bovine animal) to the cart or plough without the nose-rope. Such an owner would find oneself unable to drive the bullock at his desire. Because the bullock is wild, and because it has no nose-rope, it will either try to run off the road, or try to break loose by breaking the yoke. So first and foremost comes the practice of Mindfulness of Body – Kayanupassana.
Practice of mindfulness of body is to overcome the drudgery of binding concepts and views that we form about it. To see the body as it is and to realize what it actually is. So instead of looking at this body as a beautiful body, ugly body or eternal body a person learns to look at the body as it is and avoid the mental pains that are caused by looking at it otherwise. There are four major sections in the satipattana sutta. In Anapanasati – one gets to these steps in its correct order:
(1) mindfulness of body (kayanupassana)
(2) mindfulness of feelings (vedananupassana)
(3) mindfulness of mind (chittanupassana)
(4) mindfulness of mental behaviors (dhammanupassana).
Within the first major section on mindfulness of body there are five meditation methods.
(1) mindfulness of breathing (anapanasati)
(2) mindfulness of postures (iriyapatha)
(3) refelection on internal and external impurities and other vital parts (kunapa)
(4) analysis of four elements (dathu)
(5) reflection on nine stages of a dead body (nava seevaththika)
In Anapanasati, with the development of kayanupassana the meditator is in a position to bring vedananupassana to completion. Contemplation of feelings is nothing but becoming mindful of feelings: pleasant, unpleasant or neutral. Here he remains focused on feelings in and of themselves, ardent and mindful. By concentrating on anapanasati to a higher degree, he then brings the cittanupassana to its culmination. Now he would start to develop dhammanupassana (contemplation of mind contents). To explain how to go about practicing each of these factors is not possible as it will take a lot more than a paragraph or two for each.
- 9,689
- 1
- 11
- 26
If you're feeling confused, then asking a question here might not be the best approach to solve your problem. All you get is more information and different suggestions. They'll probably just make you think more, and as a result you get more confused.
I noticed that when I am confused what often helps is to find sources for instructions and clarification that I can trust in. For example the original teachings of the Buddha (online translations can be read at accesstoinsight.org or suttacentral.net), texts/audio/video from a well known Buddhist Theravada Monk (Bhikkhu Bodhi, Yuttadhammo Bhikkhu, Ajahn Sumedho, Ajan Jayasaro ...) or even better personal contact to one or some other experienced Buddhist practitioner.
- 1,765
- 8
- 13
-
Thanks I've tried all the things suggested and I've arrive at the point where there are just so many different and conflicting views and opinions that it's kind of turning me off buddhism as its beginning to look like every other religion in the sense that all the different varieties and sects claim that only their way is the truth. I really feel that I have done everything I have been instructed to do for so long yet it just feels so pointless sitting there looking at breath for all this time. I get more fulfilment from going to gym. Sitting is an exercise in frustration most of the time. – Saddhā Mar 01 '17 at 21:46
Basic satipatthana formula is
a monk dwells exertive, clearly aware, mindful,
observing the ____{body | feelings | mind | dhamma} in the ____{body | feelings | mind | dhamma},
removing covetousness and displeasure in regard to the world;
The key here is removing covetousness and displeasure in regard to the world, that is you do not react to pleasant sensation with craving of unpleasant sensation with aversion, whatever the 4 frame of reference it originates from. More details see this answer and these answers.
- 36,981
- 3
- 28
- 82
-
Welcome back. There were a couple of new question about S.N.Goenka, here and here, in case you'd like to answer those as well. – ChrisW Mar 10 '17 at 08:48
The four foundations of mindfulness are in the Satipatthana Sutta & Anapanasati Sutta.
The Satipatthana Sutta is merely a list of disconnected teachings and it is highly unlikely the Buddha spoke the Satipatthana Sutta in its current form.
As for the Anapanasati Sutta, it logically describes the fruition or unfolding of the four foundations of mindfulness one after eachother in terms of path fruition.
For example, when the breathing is calmed, rapture will arise. Rapture & happiness (feelings) become the predominant meditation object & replace the breathing as the primary meditation object (even though the breathing remains a secondary or anchor meditation object).
Therefore, contemplation of feelings (vedanupassana) must occur after kayanupassana (contemplation of bodies)
Every stage of the Anapanasati Sutta is practised with awareness of breathing, including contemplation of the mind (cittanupassana), as explicitly stated in the sutta.
Therefore, if the practitioner loses awareness of breathing or loses concentration, that is not the practise of anapanasati.
What this means is being vaguely of aware of all kinds of distracting thoughts & emotions is not the practise of cittanupasana.
Cittanupasana is something deeply profound & occurs with concentration (samadhi).
- 41,600
- 2
- 31
- 80
-
1I know what the 4Fs are. Thanks for explaining but that wasn't really my question though. – Saddhā Feb 28 '17 at 00:08
-
I answered your question. The satupatthana are not practised at the same time but practised one after each other. The practise of the later saitpatthana depends on the practise of the former. If the breathing is not calmed, rapture cannot arise. If rapture is not calmed, the citta cannot arise. If the citta is not liberated from impurities, 100% contemplation of impermanence & nirodha cannot occur. Regards. – Dhamma Dhatu Feb 28 '17 at 00:16
-
In other Buddhist source I learnt, it's said that in practising breathing meditation the attention should be paid at the interval of the in/out breathes - the part that's non-breathing. The longer this non-breathing lasts the more concentrated one achieved. In/out breathes are sychronizing with the flicking mind, once the mind is calmed, the breathes naturally will be smooth and long in accordance. But forcing the non-breathing to last is an over-doing. – Mishu 米殊 Feb 28 '17 at 04:39
The 4 foundations of mindfulness according to Wikipedia:
- mindfulness of the body;
- mindfulness of feelings or sensations (vedanā);
- mindfulness of mind or consciousness (citta); and
- mindfulness of dhammās.
Do I do it all at the same time
No. Mindfulness means being concentrated on one thing at one moment. If you are practising "Mindfulness of Dharmas (法)", your meditation is solely rest on contemplating the Dharma. For example, you choose "Anatta" this Dharma to contemplate, any moment when your feeling (pain, comfort, cold and hot...) of the body arose, you contemplate "Anatta", i.e., the feeling is not me, it's my body feels; the body is not me, it's composed of flesh and bone maintained by feeding on food... Anatta.
The difference of whether you are doing "Mindfulness of Vedana" or "Mindfulness of Dharma" here is, that in doing Mindfulness of Vedana, your contemplation is on the feelings. But the other practise is, the feeling lends you to move further working the way to reach "Anatta" (this is the real Vipassana taught by the Buddha, in it one acquired wisdom). When this is mastered, one can immediately see through the veils of illusion and reach into the reality of phenomena.
My speculation is that, these four foundations they must and also not necessary be going from start to end, for we don't know if someone was a Bhikiku or Yogi - so to speak - in the previous lives; whilst some may learning all these at the first time. However, following it from basic to higher level makes logical sense. For if one cannot calm their minds, one cannot do Vipassana. However, doing Vipassana, one, in contemplation, his mind is calm - note the difference of thinking (mind chatting) and contemplation. In normal condition, the easier way to calm the mind is to be mindful of the body; the even easier is to be mindful of breathing. Depends on the practitioner's personal disposition, if one is hard to calm his mind by aiming at calm the mind, contemplate the Dharma may apply to try working the other way round. Sometimes visualization or mantra chanting could be applied to achieve Samatha (止), calm the mind, in Buddhist practice other than Theravada School's.
when and how I am supposed to practice...
Always trust yourself, we tend to underestimate how capable we are able to decide what is right for us due to years molding by education and modern doctrines imposed on us. You may try all out first, get a feeling of each; or do one of it for ascribed period, or choose one to work to reach certain achievement then switch.
do I break it down into different activities
The Buddha concluded that with the body confinement we could perform 4 activities and only: 1)walk 行; 2)stand 住; 3)sit 坐; 4)recline 卧. Each of these activities can be used to practice each of the foundations of mindfulness. However, I found that Mindfulness of Dharma could conveniently be applied when one is engaging in daily going-by, whilst mindful of breathing is harder.
- 2,299
- 9
- 17
-
I don't understand what you mean by contemplate the dharmas?? You mean I sit there and when I feel a sensation I say to myself "this is not me, this is the body, the body is not me" ? So I actually say this in my mind like a thought? – Saddhā Feb 28 '17 at 22:08
-
No. When Buddha taught the Dharma such as "Anatta", "Impermanence", "12 Nidanas", these are what Buddha realized (seen) in his meditation. Now as a student we follow him step by step, and "realize" the Dharma as how he did. When we say "Anatta", Anatta is just a word, it doesn't endorse us it's intrinsic value and "extend" us - wisdom. It's a set of sounds and letters, added only one new vocabulary or term. Buddha has a clever phrase: 說食不飽 (talk about eating won't feed anyone), that's good to describe this. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 04:12
-
Now in your comment "I say to myself...", I can see that you are not yet getting it. The difference is like, a complex equation one used a calculator and produced the correct answer, meanwhile, one used paper and pen computed the same answer; this same person, by using calculator, he produced the answer, is like when you "I say to myself"; the one computed the answer on paper, is contemplation. Now you can see what's going on differently on these two sets of minds. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 04:19
-
Note that doing it on paper is prompt to error, with practice one can coming closer to accurate. Now Buddha gave out the correct answer: Dharmas, the student doing this keep referring to the answer to check how he is going. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 04:21
-
To give demonstration how to continue this "Anatta" contemplation I will further present my steps: the flesh and bone is not me, it renews constantly by shedding off old cells replacing new ones; now is this thinking me? This thinking is not me for I am reporting this thinking, there can't be two me(s). Is this "I am" me? This "I am" is not me... – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 04:47
-
Up to writing this part I was stuck, I couldn't go further. Then I thought, maybe just leave it here, it's more natural for one is unable to realize the Dharma at once normally. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 04:52
-
However, to avoid having the wrong impression that this doesn't work, I took a break then contemplate further... If this "I am" is me, it must exist at now. What is now? The moment passed follows by the next moment, the moment called "now" can never be captured and analyzed, verily there is no "now"; further, if the "now" does exist in a blink of eyes between the moment passed and next, how long the duration is this "now"? 1 second, 1/2 second? 1/2 of the 1/2 second so on and so forth... surely it will be endless to find the "now" - the now can't be found, no such moment called "now"... – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 05:22
-
... If there is no "now", "I am" can't exist... "Anatta". Well that's my steps to solve this complex equation. Anyone may have their own steps. And I can't be completely accurate in all the steps, and it could also be that I just at the end of my steps put the given answer "Anatta" to the equation. As we know, with practice, one can arrive at the answer with lesser and lesser steps, unto a moment one could immediately give the correct answer when looking at the same set of equation though it's written in varying formats. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 05:44
-
... that's how wisdom acquired. Of import is that one may not be able to arrive at the answer all at once. If it is so, keep contemplating that step one is stuck to work through (like the Ch'an Koan practice, those flocks are doing this actually, in rough description). Meanwhile, throw away my steps, do it yourself if you like to work on "Anatta", like students learning new skill by closing the textbook and answer it themselves. If you are not able or don't like to work "Anatta", choose others, "Impermanence" maybe more suitable to begin with. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 05:58
-
The Dharma told by the Buddha is like a sharp knife, and is given to the followers. However, if one doesn't take the knife in hand but let it sit on the display, it only decorates the room, not really in use. The same is those who learnt and remembered the words only. Wisdom is sharpness that cut through ignorance and illusion, Great Bodhisattva Manjurshari is depicted with a sword raising his hand in readily gesture. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 06:05
-
Now it's not all are ready to acquire wisdom, for modern people oppressed by the pressure and suffering of lives, immediate effect are more appealing. Thus people tend to prefer breathing, feeling contemplation etc. Also not a lot of people are born with ready mind capacity to do Dharma Contemplation. And Mindfulness of Dharma is so wrongly understood as far as I read the Wikipedia page and suspect those sects called "Vipassana Meditation Movement" their interpretation. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 06:14
-
The immediate benefit for doing the other such as breathing, feeling contemplation is that it calms the mind, it cures bodily ailments, further, it adjust one's mind, if one does it correctly. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 06:17
-
How do I know all these? I'm not repeating any other's words. No Buddhist teacher gives me direct teaching, though I could be from time to time inspired by few really good ones with one or two of their thoughts that I read in open sources. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 06:38
-
I representing none of the Buddhist sects though I'm quite offended by some Theravadists' claim of their authenticity and disparaging teachings they don't have knowledge of. If I have to say, the Dharma of Buddha, the Sutras and the Buddhist Treatises written by such as Nagarjuna cultivated me. Now it's your right and liberty to treat my words in whatever way you like. – Mishu 米殊 Mar 01 '17 at 06:38
-
It's all sounding way too complicated and confusing. I don't really feel any clearer about this – Saddhā Mar 01 '17 at 10:49