How could so much matter, or "all" in fact, have been concentrated in a smaller universe without being in the actual same place? Why did this not result in undercutting the Planck Length or violating the Pauli exclusion principle?
Asked
Active
Viewed 3,955 times
14
1 Answers
37
The Pauli Exclusion Principle forbids two indistinguishable fermions occupying the same quantum state. It does not prevent them getting arbitrarily close together so long as they have very different momentum states.
The big bang model relies on classical General Relativity. When we go back to scales where quantisation of space might become important (i.e. Planck length scales, corresponding to the first $\sim 10^{-43}$ s of the universe) then GR needs to be replaced by some quantum theory of gravity (which we don't have).
Glorfindel
- 4,790
- 3
- 25
- 40
ProfRob
- 151,483
- 9
- 359
- 566
-
2So, we don't know? We know normal rules won't apply but we don't know which do? – Mast Jul 03 '20 at 08:50
-
15
-
2
-
@RobJeffries And realistically, there are many more limits than knowledge -- our knowledge is like the rational numbers in a sea of real ones ;-). We can get close, sometimes. – Peter - Reinstate Monica Jul 03 '20 at 17:42
-
Did fermions even exist during the very early phases of the Big Bang? I suppose I should ask that on Physics.SE... – PM 2Ring Jul 04 '20 at 04:59
It's called a "Big Bang" and not just a "Big Beginning/Start/(whatever)…" because "Bang" is the operative word.
Whatever might have gone before, in our universe that "bang" meant it had enough energy propelling it outwards to overcome anything else.
If that should hurt Planck or Pauli, can you show the maths?
– Robbie Goodwin Jul 04 '20 at 21:54