When trying to write an e-mail address, there are always problems with the @ sign.
Solutions I've seen suggested are using some verbatim environment (more difficult in footnotes) and using a math-mode @.
What is the correct way to do this?
When trying to write an e-mail address, there are always problems with the @ sign.
Solutions I've seen suggested are using some verbatim environment (more difficult in footnotes) and using a math-mode @.
What is the correct way to do this?
Another thing one can to with the hyperref package is to use the href command
\href{mailto:me@example.com}{me@example.com}
which has the advantage that when clicked-on in an electronic document, it will (ideally) call up the mailer and cue up the e-mail address.
\email command that expands to your \href, automatically prepending the mailto: part.
– Damien Pollet
Jul 27 '10 at 07:53
\email is already defined in certain document classes (for example amsart).
– Willie Wong
Jul 27 '10 at 13:45
hyperref.
– marczellm
Feb 04 '14 at 13:35
\href link always redirects me to an email client, which I do not use! So it makes more sense for me if I can just click on the email address and it is copied to my clipboard! Is it even possible in LaTeX? Thanks!
– zyy
Oct 06 '19 at 01:01
\newcommand{\email}[1]{\href{mailto:#1}{#1}} somewhere in your preamble, that'll do just fine.
– Clément
Mar 12 '21 at 17:40
Just to add to Willie's good answer, in terms of the formatting (as the OP seems to be getting at) there isn't a "correct" way. Use \textsf or \texttt or whatever looks good for your particular document and use case and font choice. Also try the randtext package to attempt to obfuscate the email address inside the PDF to make it less susceptible to spammers (but note that — I think — it doesn't play nice with hyperref's \href).
If you want to "special-case" the @ sign without adding markup to your text, you could write something like this:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{color,hyperref}
\catcode`\_=11\relax
\newcommand\email[1]{\_email #1\q_nil}
\def\_email#1@#2\q_nil{%
\href{mailto:#1@#2}{{\emailfont #1\emailampersat #2}}
}
\newcommand\emailfont{\sffamily}
\newcommand\emailampersat{{\color{red}\small@}}
\catcode`\_=8\relax
\begin{document}
\email{foobar@gmail.com}
\end{document}
where you get the proper hyperlinking of the email address and you can customise the look of the email by changing \emailfont and the look of the ampersat (or arrobase, or @) by changing \emailampersat.
randtext was exactly what I needed. Just curious... does your command still produce a working hyperlink if I wrap a randtext{} around it? I suppose not...
– polynomial_donut
Jun 04 '17 at 09:48
You can define \at command in the preamble:
\newcommand{\at}{\makeatletter @\makeatother}
and then use it as follows within the document:
myemail\at gmail.com
@ in \at is the catcode that was set for @ at the time of the definition. If the catcode of @ should be "letter", then it is defined via \makeatletter\newcommand*{\at}{@}\makeatother. However, the catcode "letter" or "other" does not matter here, thus \newcommand*{\at}{@} would be enough or just using @.
– Heiko Oberdiek
Feb 04 '14 at 15:26
I know that you think you know what I said. But I'm not sure whether you understood that what you heard is what I meant.
– DrBeco
Feb 05 '23 at 03:53
If you don't like how the at-symbol of the default font looks (I don't), you may borrow it from the Times font, like so: youraddres{\fontfamily{ptm}\selectfont @}example.com
For the @ character I prefer the \MVAt command from the marvosym package, since the cmss @ looks so different from other fonts I'm used to. For the full address I use the hyperref formatting suggested by Willie.
I don't think that there is a unique correct way to handle this. As another answer says, you can use hyperref. But, the url package can also be used to render email addresses:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{url}
\begin{document}
\url{me@example.com}
\end{document}
\url because it will attempt to create a hyperlink to an actual URL with the email address you supply. See Caramdir's answer for a better solution.
– Will Robertson
Aug 18 '10 at 10:11
\url from the url package, not from hyperref.
– vanden
Aug 18 '10 at 15:10
\url with the hyperlinked one. The point is that \url is not semantically designed for email addresses.
– Will Robertson
Aug 19 '10 at 03:32
url via \DeclareUrlCommand\email{} and used as \email{me@example.com}.
– Heiko Oberdiek
Feb 04 '14 at 15:29
url package is loaded by hyperref and the \DeclareUrlCommand works. But the result is not a link.
– Heiko Oberdiek
Mar 16 '23 at 21:02
I defined a command, to avoid the redundancy of Willie Wong's and Caramdir's answers, and to allow protocols other than mailto:
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{xstring}
\newcommand{\thelink}{\@empty}
\newcommand{\link}[2]{%
\IfSubStr{#1}{:}{\renewcommand\thelink{#1}}{\renewcommand\thelink{#1:#2}}%
\href{\thelink}{\texttt{#2}}%
}
There's a long form, where the URL is different than the text, and the short form, where the protocol is catenated with the text to make up the URL:
Phone: \link{tel:1234567890}{+1 234-567-890} \\
E-mail: \link{mailto}{foo@bar.spam}
Produces this result:
I use \texttt instead of \nolinkurl, because the latter removed spaces from the supplied text.
There are a number of things that you can try:
(with the hyperref package):
\url{email address}
or more simply (for monospace font):
\texttt{email address}
\url because it will attempt to create a hyperlink to an actual URL with the email address you supply. See Caramdir's answer for a better solution.
– Will Robertson
Aug 18 '10 at 10:10