The Stacks project

Comments 501 to 520 out of 9050 in reverse chronological order.

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

On left comment #9219 on Lemma 12.8.2 in Homological Algebra

All categories are small unless mentioned otherwise... discussed elsewhere...


On left comment #9218 on Lemma 31.24.2 in Divisors

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9217 on Section 59.82 in Étale Cohomology

Could you please leave a comment on the page of the lemma you are commenting on? The answer to your question is that we do not use the injectivity shown earlier to prove the existence of . We just use assumption (2) applied to the restriction of to the Zariski site of .


On left comment #9216 on Lemma 9.8.10 in Fields

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9215 on Lemma 10.50.14 in Commutative Algebra

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9214 on Lemma 42.59.10 in Chow Homology and Chern Classes

Thanks a bunch! Fixed here.


On left comment #9213 on Lemma 37.13.11 in More on Morphisms

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9212 on Lemma 10.50.17 in Commutative Algebra

Good catch! Thanks! Fixed here.


On left comment #9211 on Remark 64.18.5 in The Trace Formula

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9210 on Lemma 13.27.8 in Derived Categories

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9209 on Lemma 26.24.3 in Schemes

The proof as written now is fine and I could not understand what you wrote.


On left comment #9208 on Section 6.11 in Sheaves on Spaces

Yes, this is not ideal and of course you are right that it would be better to be more careful. And somehow the last 2 sentences of the first paragraph are so bad that maybe the reader will get the idea that we're not going to be very careful about this:)

Joking aside I tried to improve a bit, see here.


On left comment #9207 on Definition 8.3.1 in Stacks

OK, thanks for getting back a second time.


On left comment #9206 on Lemma 11.6.2 in Brauer groups

Ha! Thanks for pointing this out. Fixed it here by removing the word "central" from the statement.


On left comment #9205 on Section 4.14 in Categories

Yes, Lemma 4.14.10 is correct.


On left comment #9204 on Lemma 5.8.16 in Topology

Thanks. Added it here.


On left comment #9203 on Section 34.9 in Topologies on Schemes

@#8944. Already fixed here. Please leave comments not on sections but on the pages of the individual lemmas.


On left comment #9202 on Section 110.19 in Examples

There is a curse on this page, because even in your comment there is a typo in the description of the ideal . Thanks for pointing this out and see edits here.


On left comment #9201 on Lemma 20.25.4 in Cohomology of Sheaves

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9200 on Lemma 4.14.10 in Categories

Thanks and added here.