The Stacks project

Comments 301 to 320 out of 9050 in reverse chronological order.

\begin{equation*} \DeclareMathOperator\Coim{Coim} \DeclareMathOperator\Coker{Coker} \DeclareMathOperator\Ext{Ext} \DeclareMathOperator\Hom{Hom} \DeclareMathOperator\Im{Im} \DeclareMathOperator\Ker{Ker} \DeclareMathOperator\Mor{Mor} \DeclareMathOperator\Ob{Ob} \DeclareMathOperator\Sh{Sh} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafExt{\mathcal{E}\mathit{xt}} \DeclareMathOperator\SheafHom{\mathcal{H}\mathit{om}} \DeclareMathOperator\Spec{Spec} \newcommand\colim{\mathop{\mathrm{colim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\lim{\mathop{\mathrm{lim}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Qcoh{\mathit{Qcoh}} \newcommand\Sch{\mathit{Sch}} \newcommand\QCohstack{\mathcal{QC}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Cohstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{oh}} \newcommand\Spacesstack{\mathcal{S}\!\mathit{paces}} \newcommand\Quotfunctor{\mathrm{Quot}} \newcommand\Hilbfunctor{\mathrm{Hilb}} \newcommand\Curvesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{urves}} \newcommand\Polarizedstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{olarized}} \newcommand\Complexesstack{\mathcal{C}\!\mathit{omplexes}} \newcommand\Pic{\mathop{\mathrm{Pic}}\nolimits} \newcommand\Picardstack{\mathcal{P}\!\mathit{ic}} \newcommand\Picardfunctor{\mathrm{Pic}} \newcommand\Deformationcategory{\mathcal{D}\!\mathit{ef}} \end{equation*}

On left comment #9422 on Lemma 20.26.4 in Cohomology of Sheaves

Fixed here.


On left comment #9421 on Section 10.132 in Commutative Algebra

Fixed here.


On left comment #9420 on Lemma 16.11.2 in Smoothing Ring Maps

Yes, we should add this. Going to ignore for now.


On left comment #9419 on Lemma 37.37.3 in More on Morphisms

Very good! In fact, we don't ever use this assumption in the proof. See this change.


On left comment #9418 on Lemma 20.41.6 in Cohomology of Sheaves

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9417 on Lemma 20.46.9 in Cohomology of Sheaves

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9416 on Section 36.9 in Derived Categories of Schemes

Thanks for your comments. I also tried to match the hom complexes with the definitions of them elsewhere and unfortunately this made things worse. Anyway, see changes here.


On left comment #9415 on Section 5.26 in Topology

Going to leave as is.


On left comment #9414 on Lemma 36.13.3 in Derived Categories of Schemes

Thanks a bunch. Fixed here.


On left comment #9413 on Lemma 10.141.2 in Commutative Algebra

Thanks and fixed here.


On left comment #9412 on Section 29.53 in Morphisms of Schemes

Going to leave as is.


On left comment #9411 on Section 29.54 in Morphisms of Schemes

Thanks. I added this here.


On left comment #9410 on Section 59.75 in Étale Cohomology

OK, I think you mean the SGA reference. Thanks! Fixed here.


On left comment #9409 on Section 5.2 in Topology

It just means is a name for the covering . Going to leave as is.


On left comment #9408 on Lemma 48.15.4 in Duality for Schemes

If a sentence ends in a displayed formula, then we often omit the period because to me it often looks confusing (it may even modify the statement depening on the math). But I did remove the spurious period here.


On left comment #9407 on Lemma 48.15.5 in Duality for Schemes

Argh! Luckily in the unique application of this lemma the shift is OK. Fixed here.


On left comment #9406 on Section 28.5 in Properties of Schemes

Do others find "nontrivial specialization" an unclear concept?


On left comment #9405 on Lemma 5.4.2 in Topology

Typo fixed here.


On left comment #9404 on Definition 8.2.2 in Stacks

Fixed here.


On left comment #9403 on Proposition 15.78.3 in More on Algebra

Thanks and fixed here.