1217

Let's suppose if we have a class like:

class Person { 
    internal int PersonID; 
    internal string car; 
}

I have a list of this class: List<Person> persons;

And this list can have multiple instances with same PersonIDs, for example:

persons[0] = new Person { PersonID = 1, car = "Ferrari" }; 
persons[1] = new Person { PersonID = 1, car = "BMW"     }; 
persons[2] = new Person { PersonID = 2, car = "Audi"    }; 

Is there a way I can group by PersonID and get the list of all the cars he has?

For example, the expected result would be

class Result { 
   int PersonID;
   List<string> cars; 
}

So after grouping, I would get:

results[0].PersonID = 1; 
List<string> cars = results[0].cars; 

result[1].PersonID = 2; 
List<string> cars = result[1].cars;

From what I have done so far:

var results = from p in persons
              group p by p.PersonID into g
              select new { PersonID = g.Key, // this is where I am not sure what to do

Could someone please point me in the right direction?

iank
  • 800
  • 2
  • 10
  • 29
test123
  • 13,275
  • 9
  • 26
  • 32
  • 1
    There is another example including `Count` and `Sum` here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3414080/using-groupby-count-and-sum-in-linq-lambda-expressions – NoWar Aug 05 '16 at 14:22
  • @Martin Källman: I agree with Chris Walsh. Most likely an app that has the O.P.'s "Person(s)" Class (Table) would already have a "'normal'" "Person(s)" Class (Table) that has the usu. Properties / Columns (i.e. name, gender, DOB). The O.P.'s "Person(s)" Class (Table) would prolly be a Child Class (Table) of the "'normal'" "Person(s)" Class ( Table) (i.e. an "OrderItem(s)" Class (Table) vs. a "Order(s)" Class (Table)). The O.P. was likely not using the actual name he'd use if it were in the same Scope as his "'normal'" "Person(s)" Class (Table) and/or may've simplified it for this post. – Tom Apr 25 '17 at 18:54

10 Answers10

1957

Absolutely - you basically want:

var results = from p in persons
              group p.car by p.PersonId into g
              select new { PersonId = g.Key, Cars = g.ToList() };

Or as a non-query expression:

var results = persons.GroupBy(
    p => p.PersonId, 
    p => p.car,
    (key, g) => new { PersonId = key, Cars = g.ToList() });

Basically the contents of the group (when viewed as an IEnumerable<T>) is a sequence of whatever values were in the projection (p.car in this case) present for the given key.

For more on how GroupBy works, see my Edulinq post on the topic.

(I've renamed PersonID to PersonId in the above, to follow .NET naming conventions.)

Alternatively, you could use a Lookup:

var carsByPersonId = persons.ToLookup(p => p.PersonId, p => p.car);

You can then get the cars for each person very easily:

// This will be an empty sequence for any personId not in the lookup
var carsForPerson = carsByPersonId[personId];
iliketocode
  • 6,978
  • 5
  • 46
  • 60
Jon Skeet
  • 1,335,956
  • 823
  • 8,931
  • 9,049
  • 12
    @jon Skeet what if i want to add another property like name – user123456 Sep 21 '14 at 10:50
  • 23
    @Mohammad: Then you include that in the anonymous type. – Jon Skeet Sep 21 '14 at 11:36
  • 7
    @user123456 here's a good explanation of group by, it also includes an example of grouping by a composite key: [How to: Group Query Results (C# Programming Guide)](https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb545971.aspx) – Mathieu Diepman Jan 31 '15 at 08:51
  • 18
    @Mohammad you can do something like `.GroupBy(p => new {p.Id, p.Name}, p => p, (key, g) => new { PersonId = key.Id, PersonName = key.Name, PersonCount = g.Count()})` and you will get all the people that occur with an Id, Name, and a number of occurrences for each person. – Chris Aug 06 '15 at 21:40
  • 1
    It should be PersonID instead of PersonId. – kame Nov 02 '15 at 09:13
  • 11
    @kame: I was deliberately following .NET naming conventions, fixing the OP's names, basically. Will make that clear in the answer. – Jon Skeet Nov 02 '15 at 09:51
  • 3
    instead of `var` you should put the actual type of results, to be even more clear about what this does/creates. – Don Cheadle Sep 15 '16 at 17:59
  • @Jon Skeet: Nice. However, (and this might should be a new Q) I was actually trying to create (to use terms equivalent to OP's domain) `SortedDictionary >`. The closest I could get using LINQ was `IEnumerable >>`. I ended up using @akazemis's `for(each)` loop method which, btw, was 2x faster (and of course, easier to debug). – Tom Apr 25 '17 at 23:31
  • @Tom: Yes, that sounds like a new question, and that doesn't sound like an easy-to-understand result by any means. I've added the option of using a `Lookup` to this answer, which I think would be the simplest approach... – Jon Skeet Apr 26 '17 at 05:31
  • @Jon Skeet: (Again, I'm expressing in OP's domain terms so it may not be a practical use case in his domain:) I have a multi-item - select-able combo box of PersonId's that when each item is toggled on/off, re-_defaults_ (not re-_builds_) Cars in a multi-item - select-able combo box of Cars. Therefore, I should use a structure that (w/o signicantly more memory / coding) allows the most time-efficient lookups of both PersonId's as well as CarNames is in the list of CarsNames for that PersonId. MSDN doesn't show an O for `Lookup` Properties. `SortedDictionary` ones are O(log n). – Tom Apr 26 '17 at 14:39
  • @Tom: I don't see any evidence that that *is* the OP's domain - or at least, not the problem they're trying to solve. (In particular, *they* don't express any need to look up by car name.) But I'd expect a `Lookup` to have O(1) access, as I'd expect it to be based on a `Dictionary` or similar. See https://codeblog.jonskeet.uk/2010/12/31/reimplementing-linq-to-objects-part-18-tolookup/ for details. – Jon Skeet Apr 26 '17 at 14:49
  • @Jon Skeet: 1) LOL! Ok, you're reading too much into "domain". I'm just equating my "domain"'s _terms_ to his not my whole "domain"'s _problem_ (i.e. his PersonId's are my DeptId's and his Car(Name)'s are my UserGroupId's in so far as the latter 2 are his/my items being grouped and the former are his/my Group Keys). I'm not saying he's trying to re-default combo boxes or even do a lookup of a CarName within a given Person's CarNames. Like I said, this "might should be a new Q". ... – Tom Apr 26 '17 at 15:35
  • @Jon Skeet: 2) Even if `Lookup` were O(1) (and I don't see how it could be unless the Key happens to be an integer Type _and_ happens to be ascending relative to insertion order _and_ separated by the same increment (none of which (except for the Type) are required by / specified to `Lookup`) such that it could be formulaicly resolved into an Array Index assuming it's even stored as an Array), it appears the above use of it would only allow efficient look-ups of a PersonId vs. also a CarName after retrieving that PersonId's CarNames. – Tom Apr 26 '17 at 15:35
  • @Tom: Sorry, you've lost me in terms of doing different kinds of lookup. That's got *nothing* to do with this question. It definitely sounds like you should ask a new question. As for how lookups can be O(1) (at least in the common case; absolute worst case O(n) if *everything* has the same hash code): look up hash tables... – Jon Skeet Apr 26 '17 at 15:37
  • @JonSkeet: What if you want to group by `PersonId`, but you will still need to access the other properties of `Person`? – Jonathan Wood May 14 '17 at 21:42
  • 4
    @JonathanWood: Then you'd just change `p.car` to `p` in the example in my code, and you'd end up with groups of `Person` elements. – Jon Skeet May 15 '17 at 05:34
  • How to use Where condition along with this Group by function? – Md Aslam Jun 29 '20 at 07:52
  • @MdAslam: Without more details about what you're trying to filter, it's hard to help. I suggest you ask a new question with all the relevant details. – Jon Skeet Jun 29 '20 at 07:53
  • This is actually not usable as you cannot result in further queries. – user6694745 Nov 23 '20 at 15:20
  • @user6694745: It may not be usable for *your* specific use case, but it's perfectly usable for very many use cases. (Additionally, you *can* use `ILookup` in further queries, although it's rarely beneficial to do that instead of using `GroupBy` in my experience.) – Jon Skeet Nov 23 '20 at 15:23
  • @user6694745: I'd need more details about what *exactly* you mean by that to comment further. If you believe you have a use case that isn't covered by this, please ask a new question - but for future comments, please bear in mind that there's a big difference between "this doesn't cover my specific use case" and "this is actually not usable". – Jon Skeet Nov 23 '20 at 15:51
  • This helped me with my own grouping issue.4 – Vijer Jun 19 '21 at 06:59
64
var results = from p in persons
              group p by p.PersonID into g
              select new { PersonID = g.Key,
                           /**/car = g.Select(g=>g.car).FirstOrDefault()/**/}
Patrick Hofman
  • 148,824
  • 21
  • 237
  • 306
Tallat
  • 649
  • 5
  • 2
45

You can also Try this:

var results= persons.GroupBy(n => new { n.PersonId, n.car})
                .Select(g => new {
                               g.Key.PersonId,
                               g.Key.car)}).ToList();
iliketocode
  • 6,978
  • 5
  • 46
  • 60
shuvo sarker
  • 791
  • 10
  • 20
43
var results = from p in persons
              group p by p.PersonID into g
              select new { PersonID = g.Key, Cars = g.Select(m => m.car) };
Gilad Green
  • 35,761
  • 7
  • 54
  • 89
Yogendra Paudyal
  • 1,317
  • 1
  • 12
  • 17
34

try

persons.GroupBy(x => x.PersonId).Select(x => x)

or

to check if any person is repeating in your list try

persons.GroupBy(x => x.PersonId).Where(x => x.Count() > 1).Any(x => x)
Nikolay
  • 1,008
  • 1
  • 13
  • 10
Code First
  • 357
  • 3
  • 3
15

I have created a working code sample with Query Syntax and Method Syntax. I hope it helps the others :)

You can also run the code on .Net Fiddle here:

using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Collections.Generic;

class Person
{ 
    public int PersonId; 
    public string car  ; 
}

class Result
{ 
   public int PersonId;
   public List<string> Cars; 
}

public class Program
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        List<Person> persons = new List<Person>()
        {
            new Person { PersonId = 1, car = "Ferrari" },
            new Person { PersonId = 1, car = "BMW" },
            new Person { PersonId = 2, car = "Audi"}
        };

        //With Query Syntax

        List<Result> results1 = (
            from p in persons
            group p by p.PersonId into g
            select new Result()
                {
                    PersonId = g.Key, 
                    Cars = g.Select(c => c.car).ToList()
                }
            ).ToList();

        foreach (Result item in results1)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(item.PersonId);
            foreach(string car in item.Cars)
            {
                Console.WriteLine(car);
            }
        }

        Console.WriteLine("-----------");

        //Method Syntax

        List<Result> results2 = persons
            .GroupBy(p => p.PersonId, 
                     (k, c) => new Result()
                             {
                                 PersonId = k,
                                 Cars = c.Select(cs => cs.car).ToList()
                             }
                    ).ToList();

        foreach (Result item in results2)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(item.PersonId);
            foreach(string car in item.Cars)
            {
                Console.WriteLine(car);
            }
        }
    }
}

Here is the result:

1
Ferrari
BMW
2
Audi
-----------
1
Ferrari
BMW
2
Audi

8

First, set your key field. Then include your other fields:

var results = 
    persons
    .GroupBy(n => n.PersonId)
    .Select(r => new Result {PersonID = r.Key, Cars = r.ToList() })
    .ToList()
Fer R
  • 142
  • 2
  • 8
user3474287
  • 101
  • 1
  • 2
4

Try this :

var results= persons.GroupBy(n => n.PersonId)
            .Select(g => new {
                           PersonId=g.Key,
                           Cars=g.Select(p=>p.car).ToList())}).ToList();

But performance-wise the following practice is better and more optimized in memory usage (when our array contains much more items like millions):

var carDic=new Dictionary<int,List<string>>();
for(int i=0;i<persons.length;i++)
{
   var person=persons[i];
   if(carDic.ContainsKey(person.PersonId))
   {
        carDic[person.PersonId].Add(person.car);
   }
   else
   {
        carDic[person.PersonId]=new List<string>(){person.car};
   }
}
//returns the list of cars for PersonId 1
var carList=carDic[1];
akardon
  • 37,542
  • 4
  • 28
  • 40
  • 4
    `g.Key.PersonId`? `g.SelectMany`?? You clearly didn't try this. – Gert Arnold May 26 '16 at 07:10
  • you're write I edited some codes codes in it and didn't test it. My main point was the second part. But anyway thanks for your consideration. It was too late to edit that code when I realized it's wrong. so g.Key replaces g.Key.PersonId, and Select rather than SelectMany ! so messy sorry :))) – akardon May 26 '16 at 07:18
  • 2
    @akazemis: I was actually trying to create (to use terms equivalent to OP's domain) `SortedDictionary >`. The closest I could get using LINQ was `IEnumerable >>`. I ended using your `for` loop method which, btw, was 2x faster. Also, I would use: a) `foreach` vs. `for` and b) `TryGetValue` vs. `ContainsKey` (both for DRY principle - in code & runtime). – Tom Apr 25 '17 at 23:23
3

The following example uses the GroupBy method to return objects that are grouped by PersonID.

var results = persons.GroupBy(x => x.PersonID)
              .Select(x => (PersonID: x.Key, Cars: x.Select(p => p.car).ToList())
              ).ToList();

Or

 var results = persons.GroupBy(
               person => person.PersonID,
               (key, groupPerson) => (PersonID: key, Cars: groupPerson.Select(x => x.car).ToList()));

Or

 var results = from person in persons
               group person by person.PersonID into groupPerson
               select (PersonID: groupPerson.Key, Cars: groupPerson.Select(x => x.car).ToList());

Or you can use ToLookup, Basically ToLookup uses EqualityComparer<TKey>.Default to compare keys and do what you should do manually when using group by and to dictionary. i think it's excuted inmemory

 ILookup<int, string> results = persons.ToLookup(
            person => person.PersonID,
            person => person.car);
Reza Jenabi
  • 3,226
  • 23
  • 30
1

An alternative way to do this could be select distinct PersonId and group join with persons:

var result = 
    from id in persons.Select(x => x.PersonId).Distinct()
    join p2 in persons on id equals p2.PersonId into gr // apply group join here
    select new 
    {
        PersonId = id,
        Cars = gr.Select(x => x.Car).ToList(),
    };

Or the same with fluent API syntax:

var result = persons.Select(x => x.PersonId).Distinct()
    .GroupJoin(persons, id => id, p => p.PersonId, (id, gr) => new
    {
        PersonId = id,
        Cars = gr.Select(x => x.Car).ToList(),
    });

GroupJoin produces a list of entries in the first list ( list of PersonId in our case), each with a group of joined entries in the second list (list of persons).

Dmitry Stepanov
  • 2,588
  • 6
  • 25
  • 42