6

It’s often claimed (for example in What purpose do anti-Polygamy laws serve?) that young men who can’t find a woman will instead engage in violence and other types of anti social behavior.

China currently has 17% more men than women in the 15-24 age bracket due to sex selective abortions being common in their society. Are they suffering any significant downsides as a result? They do have a very low fertility rate but South Korea’s TFR is even lower despite not having the same gender imbalance.

NoDataDumpNoContribution
  • 9,607
  • 2
  • 31
  • 59
JonathanReez
  • 50,757
  • 35
  • 237
  • 435
  • I wonder why Korea does not have the same imbalance - I would have assumed they would. – alamar Feb 16 '23 at 13:05
  • 3
  • Voting to close as off-topic but with edits this might be addressed. 2) Does the "Consequences" section of the Wikipedia articles not answer your question already though? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-ratio_imbalance_in_China
  • – Brian Z Feb 16 '23 at 13:12
  • 1
    @alamar China intentionally tried to make its birth rate be much less than the 2.1 children per woman needed to sustain a country's population with its vigorously enforced one family, old child rule. That law was very unique. (South Korea never had such a law.) Even after retracting that rule, China still has a paucity of children, both male and female, and females more so than males. – David Hammen Feb 16 '23 at 13:43
  • 1
    @BrianZ the wiki article seems to say there’s basically no visible consequences – JonathanReez Feb 16 '23 at 13:48
  • @alamar Sex-selective abortions in China were mostly because a couple was allowed to have only one child and most couples wanted it to be a male. Korea didn't have one child policy. – whoisit Feb 16 '23 at 13:48
  • Are you refering to One-child policy? Or to be more precise its results. – convert Feb 16 '23 at 13:58
  • 2
    @JonathanReez 1) I don't think you're reading the same article I linked to if you think it says there are no consequences. It discusses a wide range of them. 2) If the article actually did show that there were no consequences, it would still be a complete to answer your question as currently posed. – Brian Z Feb 16 '23 at 15:30
  • 2
    @alamar You might also ask about India, which has 7-8% more males than females. – shoover Feb 16 '23 at 17:08
  • 1
    @shoover India does have quite a lot of violence/unrest, so the answer would be less clear. China is an interesting case because it seems like they suffer zero consequences. – JonathanReez Feb 16 '23 at 17:49
  • @JonathanReez You appear to have read a different wikipedia page than I or Brian Z did. The page to which Brian Z linked details several bad consequences. – David Hammen Feb 16 '23 at 21:58
  • 1
    @BrianZ I'm not sure why this is off topic? It's asking about the result of one policy so as to inform the making of a second policy. We have allowed topics that asked about facts that would directly inform a policy instead of asking about the policy directly before, even heavily upvoted some, so how would this question be any different? I admit the question title could be cleaned up to make how the policy is relevant more clear, but the question itself seems applicable. – dsollen Feb 16 '23 at 22:07
  • @DavidHammen it doesn't look like there's any correlation between gender ratios and violence, which is the biggest claim made by anti-polygamy activists. The rest is pretty vague and might not be correlated to the gender ratio per se. – JonathanReez Feb 16 '23 at 22:37
  • @dsollen You don't currently mention any policy in your question, but you could edit based on what you're saying in the commens. – Brian Z Feb 16 '23 at 22:53
  • 2
    @BrianZ not my question, but seems OP explicitly said he is asking because it was brought up in regards to a question on the legality of polygamous marriage, legality of marriage seems a policy to me. OP could potentially add more explicitly that their interested in china is due to the 1 child policy and it's affects, but even without the latter the fact that the question directly relates to a policy of potential marriage legality seems sufficient justification for this site. – dsollen Feb 16 '23 at 23:15
  • Depends on the circumstances. If it came down to a war, it might prove an advantage; see Wagner. I.e. having lots of disposable men is useful sometimes. – the gods from engineering Feb 17 '23 at 02:31
  • Not sure what downsides are meant here? Would for example slow population growth be one? Also, what is TFR? – NoDataDumpNoContribution Feb 17 '23 at 17:37
  • 1
    @Trilarion primarily effects on crime levels, but also other factors that affect GDP growth. – JonathanReez Feb 17 '23 at 17:41