29

A thought crossed my mind recently and I was wondering if someone could explain if I'm missing something, and if so what.

Simply put, as an individual filing taxes (single, no dependents), taking the standard deduction, working the same job each year with the taxes taken out of each paycheck, shouldn't I have a zero tax balance when I complete my 1040 ?

This stems from the (possibly incorrect) assumption that my work is withdrawing taxes from each paycheck correctly. If that is true, shouldn't I be all paid up at the end for the year?

I was discussing this with a friend recently, and we couldn't see the flaw, but I am sure I am missing something because, frankly, it sounds too good to be true.

So if a single person takes the standard deduction for their US taxes, works the same job all year, has no tax credits/penalties, but somehow still get a refund or owes additional taxes, does that necessarily mean that their paychecks were off? Or is there something else I am missing?

NL - Apologize to Monica
  • 32,709
  • 19
  • 85
  • 144
  • 16
    Withholding calculations are woefully inadequate and typically lead to very large returns, or owing money. – Pete B. Jan 12 '18 at 11:33
  • 1
    Because your employer doesn't use Turbo Tax to calculate how much to withhold for each paycheck. – BlackThorn Jan 12 '18 at 17:14
  • 2
    I'm not sure if these merit a separate answer, but two further issues are: If you don't have your job for the whole year, that throws the calculations off. Also, if you want the witholdings to be correct down to the penny, then rounding is going to be an issue; round(a)+round(b) can easily be different from round(a+b). – Acccumulation Jan 12 '18 at 18:06
  • 1
    @Acccumulation actually, due to IRS rounding, you don't need your withholding to be accurate down to the penny, just to 0.50. – iheanyi Jan 12 '18 at 19:44
  • 4
    Anecdotally, the first year I started working, I owed $1 to state and got a $1 Federal refund. But that year I was not head of household, had no deductions, no credits, no interest, was single, and had work hours I could predict down to the minute. Every year since, I've received a refund using just standard allowances. There's so many rules regarding taxes that owing close to $0 is practically a once-in-a-lifetime event. – phyrfox Jan 12 '18 at 20:02
  • @PeteB. I suspected as much, but was kinda hoping someone could convince me otherwise (wishful thinking perhaps) – PawnInGameOfLife Jan 13 '18 at 02:21
  • @phyrfox That is indeed impressive!!! – PawnInGameOfLife Jan 13 '18 at 02:33
  • FWIW, here in Israel that's the SOP, even for more complex than the OP's situation. Therefore, most non-self-employed folks don't file taxes at all - the employer does it for them, mostly through the deductions (with adjustment on the December deduction, if needed). – Jonathan Jan 15 '18 at 07:47
  • For some reason, in the UK I've always owed £0 and gotten £0 back. – gerrit Jan 15 '18 at 12:18
  • @iheanyi I don't think you understand rounding. The IRS rounds to the nearest dollar, and then that rounded figure is exactly how much you owe. If you owe $17, and withholding is $17.01, then you get a $.01 refund. – Acccumulation Jan 15 '18 at 19:09
  • @Acccumulation You're confused. The IRS allows either rounding or reporting exact amounts on your return. If you round, everything will be to the nearest dollar and there will be no refund of fractional dollar amounts. So, as long as your withholding is accurate to 50 cents, you'd be fine. – iheanyi Jan 15 '18 at 20:51
  • @Acccumulation hmm, I see a source of confusion that I created - I was referring to your total withholding amount for the year as the on that needs to get within 50 cents - not each paycheck. – iheanyi Jan 15 '18 at 20:58

9 Answers9

39

The withholding is not that accurate. Look at the personal allowances worksheet (PDF). A single allowance could be

  1. You, filing.
  2. You, filing married; spouse not working.
  3. You, filing Head of Household.
  4. A dependent.
  5. $2000 or more of creditable dependent expenses.
  6. A child, if you make less than $70k and have 2-4 children.
  7. Half a child, if you make less than $70k and have one child.
  8. A child, if you make $70-84k.

But these events are not all the same. For example, you filing singly was about a $6k deduction. And you filing as your own dependent was about a $4k deduction. However, for withholding purposes, they treat them identically. They don't even know what your 2 allowances mean. They just know that you wrote a 2 there.

Note: the new tax law will change these numbers but is unlikely to change the basic problem.

So no, even if you fill out your withholding correctly, only have one job, have the same compensation for the entire year (no overtime or raise to confuse things), don't itemize or have nonstandard deductions, and are single, you are not guaranteed to have the correct amount withheld from your paycheck even if your employer follows your filing.

Of course, if you do itemize or have nonstandard deductions, a second job, or varying compensation, this can be even worse.

Brythan
  • 20,968
  • 6
  • 53
  • 67
  • According to OP, "an individual filing taxes (single, no dependents), taking the standard deduction, working the same job each year". Thus, 89% of your allowances are meaningless. – RonJohn Jan 12 '18 at 14:59
  • 19
    @RonJohn - true, but harsh. Brythan's answer offered a bigger picture of the issues the (typical) single digit output the W4 creates. When another member has a similar question, but whose exact situation is slightly different reads this, they'll see an answer that covers them as well. – JTP - Apologise to Monica Jan 12 '18 at 15:17
  • 9
    And I think you both are missing the point. The withholding is based on the allowances. Even if head of household is not the withholding that this person uses, the system still relies on every one of these situations being identical. So when this person files as single, standard deduction, no dependents, the system can't tell the difference from any other situation that produces two allowances. E.g. the second job of a head of household with three dependents who already claimed three or more allowances on the first job. – Brythan Jan 12 '18 at 19:50
21

This stems from the (possibly incorrect) assumption that my work is withdrawing taxes from each paycheck correctly.

I think this stems rather from an ambiguity in the use of the word "correctly". I would expect that your employer withholds correctly in that it complies with the Internal Revenue code, and particularly the regulations for calculating and withholding taxes published annually in IRS Publication 15.

What your employer is not doing is calculating your end-of-year effective tax rate, and then applying that rate to each paycheck. That is not possible to do in the general case.

The information your payroll department has from your W4 form is only your marital status and the number of allowances that you claim. Even if you know that you have no dependents, no investments, no interest-bearing savings, and no other jobs, none of that information is available to payroll (except informally, if you work for a small employer). And as Brythan points out, an allowance can mean any number of things, with different tax implications alone or when combined.

If you want your withholding to be closer to your exact per-check tax liability than the approximation given by your number of allowances, you can fine-tune the withholding amount by filling in a dollar amount on line 6 of your W4, rather than relying on the allowance count alone.

user4556274
  • 1,997
  • 1
  • 13
  • 15
  • 5
    put more clearly: The tax withholds are a back-of-the-envelope-estimation, so that at the end of the year the amount you owe is probably small. This is important so people don't have to save up as much, and the gov't can spend the money sooner. – Mooing Duck Jan 12 '18 at 21:03
  • I would assume in my case the effective tax rate is fairly consistent through the year for my job. I am salaried, work in a small company (~20 people), we typically get a Christmas/holiday bonus (with taxes taken withdrawn) and one raise a year that takes effect usually in the first month. Not a lot of variation throughout the year otherwise, but I could see how that could cause some estimation errors. – PawnInGameOfLife Jan 13 '18 at 02:29
  • 1
    Note that end of year bonus can cause problems. If it a lump sum many companies follow IRS guidance and withhold 25%, or they add it to the regular paycheck and that one check looks like you make a lot of money which can mean that it is withheld at too high of a rate for that one check. You will get the extra back in April, but that does throw off the withholding. – mhoran_psprep Jan 13 '18 at 12:22
  • Answer says: "What your employer is not doing is calculating your end-of-year effective tax rate, and then applying that rate to each paycheck. That is not possible to do in the general case." This is possible in general, but not currently possible in the United States. The British payroll tax system gets this right for at least 80% of employees, including those with multiple jobs and those who change jobs or marry during the year. The US could adopt the British style tax code to replace the W-4, and simplify end of year taxes at a stroke. I doubt it would ever be possible for 100% of cases. – Qsigma Jan 14 '18 at 13:27
  • 2
    @Qsigma, this answer is all in context of the US tax code, so "not possible in the general case" is comparing other US tax payers with this particular US tax payer, not comparing the US income tax system with other tax systems. Even in the US, the federal social insurance taxes (as opposed to the federal income taxes) are withhold on an exact pay-as-you-go basis, with end-of-year adjustments never needed for wage-earners with a single employer, covering most US taxpayers. Note the W4 is not the cause of the complication; it is a symptom. – user4556274 Jan 14 '18 at 13:53
  • Thanks for clarifying. Thought it appears to me that the W-4 is the cause of the problem, that is probably something that I should ask as separate question. – Qsigma Jan 14 '18 at 14:14
  • 1
    @MooingDuck "amount you owe is probably small". I suspect the IRS sets the withholding rates to usually overwithhold, so people are more likely to get a refund. This allows the government to take advantage of the float. And naive taxpayers like to get refunds, they think of it as a bonus. – Barmar Jan 15 '18 at 08:53
12

Two things I can think of:

  1. You might have changes to your AGI that the payroll system doesn't know about. Extra income like dividends or a side job, for example.
  2. You filled out your W-4 incorrectly, or haven't updated it lately.
  3. As @JPhi1618 mentioned, overtime pay will throw a wrench in the calculations.

EDIT: this is based on OP's qualifications:

  1. an individual filing taxes
  2. single, no dependents
  3. taking the standard deduction,
  4. working the same job each year
RonJohn
  • 50,666
  • 10
  • 106
  • 170
  • 3
  • Unemployment. 4) Change of employment. I was employed for 4 months... unemployed for 4 months... then got a new job which pays 20% more than the first 4 months. So the last 4 months are taken out at a higher bracket. At the end of the year, the new job at a higher bracket will get adjusted down - since that higher tax rate assumes I'll make X for the year but in reality, for the year, I made much less than X and will get taxed for Y.
  • – WernerCD Jan 12 '18 at 14:45
  • 1
  • Change of tax laws.
  • – Simon Richter Jan 12 '18 at 16:36
  • @SimonRichter I think that's covered under "#2 You filled out your W-4 incorrectly, or haven't updated it lately." – RonJohn Jan 12 '18 at 17:13